I wasn't sure they would do the right thing after some of the decisions they have come up with lately. But they got this one right!ickle:
I really can't believe that the Gun control nuts actually took this to the supreame court. They have now validated what gun rights people have been claiming all along, that we have a constitutional right to own firearms.
Well said Bruce. I'm 110% with you on that. Buckshot it was a gun, want to be owner, that took it to the supreme court. He along with a couple others sued for their right to have a hand gun in their home in DC. Now they still can't own an semi autos or carry but that will probably be next and is a more local issue from the fed perspective i'll bet, and you will see these laws suits all over the country. They need to apply more of this mentality to the rest of the constitution. ITS A GREAT DAY FOR AMERICAickle:ickle:ickle:ickle: I'm still dancing!!!!
"Buckshot it was a gun, want to be owner, that took it to the supreme court. He along with a couple others sued for their right to have a hand gun in their home in DC."
True it was a want to be owner that brought the lawsuit but when they lost the case in appeals court the anti's would have been better off dropping it there instead of appealing to the supreame court. They have dealt the anti-gun movement a near death blow.
A forum community dedicated to deer hunters and hunting enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about safety, gear, tips, tricks, optics, hunting, gunsmithing, reviews, reports, accessories, classifieds, and more!