 | | 
10-20-2009, 04:16 PM
| | B&C 100 Class | | Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 86
| | Open sights or optics?
I just purchased my first shotgun and wonder if I should learn to shoot it with factory-installed open sights (V-shaped), or would I need to spend some extra-money to install optics.
I plan to hunt deer with the rifled barrel and deer is quite a big target. And thinking abou toptics, that's a lot of hassle and pretty big extra-expense. But everybody I hear suggest to install it. Does anybody hunt with open sights these days?
| 
10-20-2009, 04:22 PM
| | B&C 160 Class | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Maryland
Posts: 790
| | I'm an optics guy. Getting older now and being able to get a zoomed in veiw of my target only insures a good clean kill. Well worth the extra $$$ in my book. | 
10-20-2009, 04:46 PM
| | Moderator | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Oregon, Ohio
Posts: 6,049
| |
I totally agree with wmi, even a red dot as minimum, but a 4X scope would be better. The modern shotguns allow you to shoot far greater than most with good eyes can acheive. When you can aford it go with a scope.
| 
10-20-2009, 05:00 PM
| | B&C 100 Class | | Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 86
| |
Well, it's not so necessarily about money as about how inconvenient it is to have a scoped shotgun vs. how inconvenient it is to have a shotgun without scope.
I bought the shotgun for its versatility, i.e. to be able to hunt deer, rabbit, maybe some birds down the road. I believe that a scope on a smoothbore when rabbit hunting might be a nuisance (at best), an obstacle or safety hazard (I heard lots of stories about getting a black eye from the scope and don't want to experience it).
I don't intend to shoot a deer at distances greater than 100 yrds or so (or I would purchase a rifle for deer hunting and then I would install a scope). Hopefully, I shall be sufficiently good at that distance for a lung area.
However, if there's a scope which can be mounted and useful for quick target aquisition (to do rabbit/birds shooting) and safe, I'd probably strongly consider such option... My eyes aren't perfect even with contacts.
| 
10-20-2009, 05:33 PM
| | |
you said you would be hunting deer with the rifled barrel. you won't be using a rifled barrel for rabbits and birds. scope it.
| 
10-20-2009, 05:43 PM
| | B&C 100 Class | | Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 86
| |
I own both smoothbore and rifled barrels and I plan to change the barrels often (only deer needs a rifled barrel, after the season is over, I would change it back to smoothbore). So, if I get scope installed professionally (with lock tight), it stays there for both barrels.
| 
10-20-2009, 06:28 PM
|  | B&C 100 Class | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Grove,Oklahoma
Posts: 195
| |
So I guess what you are saying,is that your scope would have to mount to the receiver of your shotgun,and not to the barrel?My slug barrel has a cantilever scope mount and mine stays attached to the barrel.If I had to go to that trouble,maybe they make a quick detach scope base that would still allow you to use your bead on your smooth bore barrel.I that would not work,then I don't think I would mount a scope.It's too expensive to keep sighting in.
__________________
Knight:Born To Hunt
| 
10-20-2009, 07:10 PM
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by tbighunter So I guess what you are saying,is that your scope would have to mount to the receiver of your shotgun,and not to the barrel?My slug barrel has a cantilever scope mount and mine stays attached to the barrel.If I had to go to that trouble,maybe they make a quick detach scope base that would still allow you to use your bead on your smooth bore barrel.I that would not work,then I don't think I would mount a scope.It's too expensive to keep sighting in. | what he said
| 
10-20-2009, 07:52 PM
|  | B&C 160 Class | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: concord nh
Posts: 1,183
| |
how about a red dot scope? big opening to look through, not as sencitive about eye releafe distance. quicker sooting than a standerd scope, and more acurate than open sites.
| 
10-20-2009, 08:13 PM
|  | | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Vermont
Posts: 4,603
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by hunt NH how about a red dot scope? big opening to look through, not as sencitive about eye releafe distance. quicker sooting than a standerd scope, and more acurate than open sites. | I'd suggest the Red dot also.
__________________ Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the outcome of the vote.
-Benjamin Franklin |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may post new threads You may post replies You may not post attachments You may edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | |