 | | 
01-13-2012, 07:45 PM
| | B&C 140 Class | | Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Minnesota
Posts: 508
| | I have a decision to make about a new rifle
I am considering buying a replacement rifle for the one my Son claimed.
The choices I am considering are
Winchester M70 Featherweight Stainless in 30-06 with a walnut stock and moa trigger. A laminated stock isn't offered...
or
Ruger M77 Hawkeye Stainless in 30-06 with a laminated stock and the hawkeye trigger.
How does the group think these compare?
Karl
| 
01-13-2012, 08:10 PM
| | B&C 140 Class | | Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: new york
Posts: 910
| |
I think i would chose the winchester,the reviews of the new model 70's have been positive.I dont wanna start an argument but the rugers ive seen are hit or miss in the accuracy dept.(imho).Have you looked at a CZ550(30/06)hammer forged barrel, mauser action, good adj trigger with the option of a set trigger,alot more gun for less money.
| 
01-14-2012, 01:54 AM
|  | B&C 160 Class | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: concord nh
Posts: 1,183
| |
Ruger. for me any time ruger is one of the options, its always gona be ruger.
| 
01-14-2012, 06:24 AM
|  | B&C 160 Class | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,557
| |
X2 on the Ruger
Have not heard any complaints on the way the Rugers shoot expecially the M77's
__________________ Remember when posting what may seem innocent to you may not to others, text shows NO emotions so please,,, don't take it personal & automatically go on the defense. Take it w/ a grain of salt, take it as a joke or just let it go. "If George Washington was asked for his I.D. do you think he just wipped out a quarter?" Steven Wright | 
01-14-2012, 06:40 AM
|  | | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Vermont
Posts: 4,603
| |
Both weapons are even in all departments, but between these two choices I'd probably sway a little toward the Ruger also.
__________________ Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the outcome of the vote.
-Benjamin Franklin | 
01-14-2012, 10:50 AM
|  | B&C 140 Class | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Central Texas
Posts: 797
| |
My semi-auto's are Remingtons and my bolt actions are Savage. Can't help you in that decision one bit. Sorry . . . .
RR
| 
01-14-2012, 07:58 PM
|  | B&C 100 Class | | Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: SE-AK
Posts: 69
| |
Ruger, or go look at Remingtons. But for me it would be Ruger over Winchester.
__________________
NRA Life member
NAHC Life member
USN Retired
| 
01-15-2012, 01:50 PM
| | Moderator | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Oregon, Ohio
Posts: 6,049
| |
Winchester would be my pick of the ones in your list.
| 
01-16-2012, 10:57 AM
|  | B&C 120 Class | | Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Frankfort,Il
Posts: 306
| | I have both(older models) 77 and M-70, they both shoot great. As far as Featherweight, I personally don't care for a super-light rifle, I feel a long gun with a little more weight is a lot more stable, especially when shooting offhand. They are both comparable as far as features go, sounds to me like you would rather have a lam stock. If that's the case, your choice is solved! | 
01-16-2012, 11:59 AM
| | Moderator | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Oregon, Ohio
Posts: 6,049
| |
Weight is the thing I need to shed as I don't like heavy rifles anymore. I wouldn't want to shoot 300mag in a 6 lb rifle but a 260 Rem with a 140 gr would be a great deer rifle in a light weight model. I guess you have to decide what will work best for the $'s spent. You know women knew that buying/shopping really is fun, and they tried to keep us out of that loop. Have fun shopping and let us know what you brought home.
|  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may post new threads You may post replies You may not post attachments You may edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | |