.308win vs .270win - Page 2 - Deer Hunting Forums

Go Back   Deer Hunting Forums > General Forums > Rifle Hunting
Rifle Hunting Discuss Rifle Season topics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 08-26-2010, 05:13 AM
gfdeputy2's Avatar
gfdeputy2 gfdeputy2 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 2,859
Default

As much as I love my .270 I have to agree with onehorse ballisticly I don't think you will really notice a difference between them well at least here 99% of my shots have been under 50yds my longest was about 75-80 yrds I don't have many places I can hunt that have shots over 200yds
if you are looking for long range then I would say the .270 has a slight advantage
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 08-26-2010, 11:24 AM
WisconsinDeer's Avatar
WisconsinDeer WisconsinDeer is offline
B&C 140 Class
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 820
Default

I own a Stevens 200 in .243 topped with a Center Point 4-16x40 scope. I use it for coyotes. Its an AWESOME rifle, it uses the same tried and true Savage 110 action. The only different is this doesn't have Savage's AccuTrigger and it has a cheaper synthetic stock. The trigger on the Steven's is still good and the synthetic stock doesn't really bother me much. I say go for it.

Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 08-26-2010, 11:34 AM
Karl.Luhr Karl.Luhr is offline
B&C 140 Class
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 686
Default Steven's or Marlin

Before you buy the Steven's 200 I would try to find a Marlin XL7 and give it a good look. I think that the price of both will be similar. I personally prefer the Marlin. Let us know what you end up with. I would also recommend against the package deals where they include the scope. Most of the package scopes are not very good. There is a really big difference between a 50 dollar scope and one that costs 150. Try to get as much scope as you can afford.

Karl
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 08-26-2010, 11:47 AM
extremehunter007's Avatar
extremehunter007 extremehunter007 is offline
B&C 100 Class
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 110
Default

id say 270...just in case you decide to hunt something bigger....
__________________
Remington 710 .270
Smith And Wesson M&P40
Mossberg 835 Ulti-Mag 12 Ga
CVA optima Mag .50 cal. Muzzleloader
1968 Browning recurve
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 08-26-2010, 11:55 AM
WisconsinDeer's Avatar
WisconsinDeer WisconsinDeer is offline
B&C 140 Class
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 820
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by extremehunter007 View Post
id say 270...just in case you decide to hunt something bigger....
Energy wise the .308 and the .270 are about the same. The .308 shoots heavier bullets generally and the .308 fires a .308 diameter bullet while the .270 shoots a .277 diameter bullet. Personally I'd rather have the .308 if I was hunting bigger game.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 08-26-2010, 12:10 PM
extremehunter007's Avatar
extremehunter007 extremehunter007 is offline
B&C 100 Class
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 110
Default

its all preference. the .308 is a nice round, and yes you can get bigger bullets, but the .270 is a flatter round. yes the velocities are about the same, but it goes beyond that. the muzzle energy and down range energy are higher than the .308. just depends on what you are shooting, bullet, powder, etc.
__________________
Remington 710 .270
Smith And Wesson M&P40
Mossberg 835 Ulti-Mag 12 Ga
CVA optima Mag .50 cal. Muzzleloader
1968 Browning recurve
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 08-28-2010, 06:47 PM
dorn66 dorn66 is offline
Scrub Buck
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: west. ny
Posts: 9
Default 308/270

thier both built off std 30-06 case the real differace is the 308 was shortened the 270 a much faster rifle with its 27 cal bullet but why buy unless u want a corvette with a 4 cyl motor just by the basic 06 and i think you would be much further ahead although of the two go with the 270 the dorn.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 10-22-2011, 01:13 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

the freakin 270 kicks like a mule it has a very sharp recoil to it,i own 300 ultra mags,7mm ultra mags,300 win mags, i can shoot these a lot better than the 270 because it kick so freaking bad, i have owned 3 .270s none of witch i kept becouse of recoil,go with the .308

Last edited by Unregistered; 10-22-2011 at 01:16 PM.
Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 10-22-2011, 06:37 PM
Crawdaddy Crawdaddy is offline
B&C 100 Class
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Tijeras, NM
Posts: 189
Default

Both are fine rounds. I prefer 30 cal bullets but that is nothing but personal preference.

308 being a NATO round, there will always be lots of surplus ammo for plinking.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 10-22-2011, 07:43 PM
turner's Avatar
turner turner is offline
B&C 140 Class
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Tn
Posts: 511
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
the freakin 270 kicks like a mule it has a very sharp recoil to it,i own 300 ultra mags,7mm ultra mags,300 win mags, i can shoot these a lot better than the 270 because it kick so freaking bad, i have owned 3 .270s none of witch i kept becouse of recoil,go with the .308
Gee, another UNREGISTERED guest with a strong, controversial opinion!! Hard to believe, ain't it??
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Top Posters
Hunting Man7690
buckfever5650
BruceBruce19595422
timberghost3916
joel the signman3608
tator3181
gfdeputy22859
delbert1511
Buckshot1219
hunt NH1203
Photos
deer season 2012
timthehunter
deer season 2012
Team DHC Articles


    All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:00 AM.



    LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8