.270win vs .308win vs 6.5x55 swede !!! - Deer Hunting Forums

Go Back   Deer Hunting Forums > General Forums > Rifle Hunting
Rifle Hunting Discuss Rifle Season topics

Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2010, 12:56 AM
Scrub Buck
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Kawerau, Bay of Plenty, New Zealand
Posts: 5
Exclamation .270win vs .308win vs 6.5x55 swede !!!

Hi this is now my second post I thought I had my mind set on the 6.5x55 tikka T3 but the man at the gun store has advised against it for a new comer to hunting like myself and suggests I get something a little bigger e.g. .270 or .308 etc. for deer sized game. So can I please get so advice and knowledge on these calibers. ( also in my country New Zealand we are not big users of the 30 06 I do not no why but we are, and there is not much ammo avaliable for it so I would like to stay away from it at this point.) Cheers
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2010, 09:36 AM
BruceBruce1959's Avatar  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Vermont
Posts: 5,701

the .270 has a great reputation for long range, flat shooting.
I'd go with the .270
Good Luck
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the outcome of the vote.
-Benjamin Franklin

Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2010, 10:15 AM
Posts: n/a

i'd choose the 270 over the 308 and if the 6.5 is about the same as the 260 rem then it would be a tough choice
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-23-2010, 02:32 PM
extremehunter007's Avatar
B&C 100 Class
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 110

as most know, i am a HUGE .270 guy. i had a post up a few days ago about the 270 vs. the 30-06. honestly, the .308 is a really nice round. however, if you are looking at a nice powerful, long range gun with a good bit of knock down power, i would stick with the .270. it really depends on how much you are willing to spend. there are .308 long guns out there that can reach out pretty far, ie. over 1000 yards. as for the .270, the farthest i have shot is 874 yards, and was hitting a 10" plate of 1/4 inch steel about 7/10 times. i have never had anything run on me with it. LOTS of knockdown power. as for the other cal., i am really not to sure about it. ill do some research and get back to you on that one. usually the metric cal. weapons are going to be an arm and a leg for ammo. Happy trails. hope this helped,

Remington 710 .270
Smith And Wesson M&P40
Mossberg 835 Ulti-Mag 12 Ga
CVA optima Mag .50 cal. Muzzleloader
1968 Browning recurve
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-23-2010, 07:29 PM
B&C 140 Class
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 849
Default my 2 cents on your caliber choice

I would go with the .308. Reason is simple you say ammo is a little scarce. At least say you can't get 30-06 the most popular big game round in the world. If you go with the .308 Win you are also buying the 7.62 Nato round which was the standard for US, UK, Ger, Austrailia, and I would bet New Zealand. I personally don't think if you shoot an animal with the .308 you will regret not having a .270 or 30-06.

Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Top Posters
Hunting Man8366
joel the signman3608
hunt NH1203
veny on the move
veny on the move

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:31 PM.

User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1