Go Back   Deer Hunting Forums > General Forums > Rifle Hunting
Rifle Hunting Discuss Rifle Season topics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 10-24-2009, 04:40 PM
ronn
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

for grins and giggles, bruce, do you have the fps and energy differences at those ranges as well. my guess is the energy drops of faster at the longer distances with the lighter bullet. not looking to disagree or anything just think it would be interesting for those who are newer to hunting/shooting. i had the same deal with 175 gr and 160 gr out of my 7mm mag. and for realistic hunting range the 160's were a better choice.
Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 10-24-2009, 04:44 PM
Hunting Man Hunting Man is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Oregon, Ohio
Posts: 5,727
Default

ronn, I was going to go into the knock down energy thing where the 150 would win but.... you kinda did.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 10-24-2009, 04:54 PM
ronn
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

what i found with my 7 mm mag was because the lighter bullet was much faster at less than 300 yards it was almost the same energy. it wasn't till you stretched it out there to 4 and 5 hundred that the heavy bullet took the upper hand in more ways than one and thats just not a shot I was willing to take. 10 yards either side of 500 makes a pretty big difference in drop. I was working a load up for a moose hunt.
Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 10-24-2009, 05:08 PM
tbighunter's Avatar
tbighunter tbighunter is offline
B&C 100 Class
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Grove,Oklahoma
Posts: 195
Default

My 270 does not group well at all with 130's.I went to 150's and now it's a shooter.
__________________
Knight:Born To Hunt
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 10-24-2009, 05:50 PM
BruceBruce1959's Avatar
BruceBruce1959 BruceBruce1959 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Vermont
Posts: 4,470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ronn View Post
for grins and giggles, bruce, do you have the fps and energy differences at those ranges as well. my guess is the energy drops of faster at the longer distances with the lighter bullet.
It's a real pain trying to align the ballistic table on here but here's the link to the Full Comparison.
But no the Energy (ft-lbs.) drops faster on the heavier 150 grain vs. the 130 so it turns out that the 130 grain retains velocity & energy much better..

Remington Ballistics Information on the .130 grain vs. the 150 grain Bullets
__________________
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the outcome of the vote.
-Benjamin Franklin

Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 10-24-2009, 07:01 PM
ronn
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

well how bout that!? thanks for the link bruce. looks like the 130 is by far the better choice, if they group well out of your gun. thanks again bruce.

Last edited by ronn; 10-24-2009 at 07:05 PM. Reason: addition
Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2010, 05:27 PM
pngndn pngndn is offline
Scrub Buck
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: lumberton, tx
Posts: 2
Default what grain

i shot a 130 grain nosler ballistic tip..shot three bucks this year and they didn't move very far..the farthest shot was a little over 200 yards in oklahoma
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2010, 05:46 PM
retrieverhunter retrieverhunter is offline
Scrub Buck
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 19
Default

I have a novel idea! Try both and see which shoots MOST ACCURATELY out of YOUR gun.

That being said, I have killed well over 100 head of game with a 270, and my old Ruger has always shot 150 gr bullets better and is what I have always shot. My son's Encore 270, on the other hand, shoots 140 gr Accubonds into one hole at 100 yards, and in his 5 years of hunting with it, he has amassed quite body count using them.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2010, 11:21 PM
kemster99's Avatar
kemster99 kemster99 is offline
B&C 140 Class
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 554
Default

when i first started hunting georgia, i was shooting 150 gr cor-locks. too big of exit wounds. could fit both of my fists in it. changed to 130 gr. then switched ammo altogether and went with 140 gr winchester fail-safes. worked real well on deer and hogs. now shoot the Hornady 130 gr SST. am very happy with the results on deer and them big, nasty boar hogs down here in Fl.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 01-06-2010, 04:26 PM
Body Bag's Avatar
Body Bag Body Bag is offline
B&C 100 Class
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Lower Arkansas
Posts: 137
Default

270 Winchester 130 gr. Supreme® Ballistic Silvertip®


That's what I shoot. All of them will do the job.

Yards Drop
100 1.4
200 0
300 -6.5
400 -18.9
500 -38.4

Granted I have never had the need to shoot one farther than 80 yards with the this gun. So the cheapest 150 grain corelock would be just as deadly
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Top Posters
Hunting Man5727
buckfever5473
BruceBruce19594470
joel the signman3608
timberghost3447
tator2132
gfdeputy21472
delbert1166
Buckshot1156
hunt NH1118
Photos
misc pics
cloven hoofed stalker
misc pics
Team DHC Articles


    All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:16 PM.



    LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8