good rifle scope for deer hunting - Page 2 - Deer Hunting Forums
Rifle Hunting Discuss Rifle Season topics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
post #11 of 19 (permalink) Old 07-17-2013, 06:21 PM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Oregon, Ohio
Posts: 8,380
I agree with everything we both said!
Hunting Man is offline  
Advertisement
 
post #12 of 19 (permalink) Old 07-18-2013, 08:06 AM
B&C 100 Class
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Levittown NY
Posts: 36
When it comes to optics Clarity and Brightness is what you are looking for. A 50mm obj. lens is designed to gather more available light. When researching a scope concentrate on the percentage of available light it gathers. Forget bells and whistles and spend on the lens!!
NYHunter is offline  
post #13 of 19 (permalink) Old 07-18-2013, 10:32 PM
B&C 140 Class
 
Hellbilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Citra,Fl
Posts: 986
I have had and used leoupold scopes, but I use a Nikon pro staff 3x9x40 now and I like it better. very clear have to watch the light cuz it can get you in trouble being past shooting time but can still see it clear in scope

Born on a mountain raised in a cave huntin and fishin is all I crave
Hellbilly is offline  
Advertisement
 
post #14 of 19 (permalink) Old 07-19-2013, 03:28 PM
B&C 160 Class
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: new york
Posts: 1,115
Nikons to me are better than Leopolds much clearer and brighter and their are some great scopes for a good bargain.For a little more 399$ i think the Zeiss Conquest 3-9 is untouchable at this price.I have four of them and Nikon Leupolds which i also have dont compare.IMHO
spiker is offline  
post #15 of 19 (permalink) Old 07-19-2013, 04:28 PM
B&C 140 Class
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 850
Zeiss 3x9x40 scopes were onsale at Cabellas or Gander

It was either Cabellas or Gander that was selling the Zeiss 3x9x40 Conquests for 300.xx a couple of months ago. I didn't buy any at that price, and I now regret not getting atleast three.

Karl
Karl.Luhr is offline  
post #16 of 19 (permalink) Old 07-27-2013, 06:48 PM
B&C 140 Class
 
onehorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Montana
Posts: 798
Everyone like their brand of scope best, so I'll just that all mine are Leupolds. My main comment has more to do with power than make. At the ranges you are talking about, I agree with Hunting Man that you could save money by getting a fixed power (I'd suggest 4X or less) OR you could spend the same amount and upgrade to a "better" brand.
onehorse is offline  
post #17 of 19 (permalink) Old 08-24-2013, 10:32 PM
B&C 120 Class
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Southern New Hampshire
Posts: 283
Given your short ranges I would recommend a fixed power scope. A 3 x 9 is too much glass for your application. Nikon scopes deliver the goods.
Rozman62 is offline  
post #18 of 19 (permalink) Old 08-28-2013, 07:40 PM
B&C 140 Class
 
turner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Tn
Posts: 602
Gee, lots of opinions here. I bought and used a lot of cheap scopes for years. I am now over that, done with that for any serious hunting rifles I now own. At the ranges you mention (under 100 yards should some who never bothered to take note) a quality scope in 1-4 or 2-7 will fill your bill the best. I think I know, owning about 35-40 big game rifles so topped.

At the lowest end of quality lies the Nikon Prostaff 2-7x32; a fine scope and will make you smile 99% of the time. Better.... a 2-7x33 Leupold VX1 and also a 2-7x35 Burris FFII. I might know, I own them all.

Mt best recommendation.... do NOT get a 3-9x40 of any make or kind, you DO NOT NEED IT!! The lower powered scopes I mentioned are better choices (MORE FOV) and lower priced than are the higher powered quality scopes some mentioned.

My choice ...... a quality 1-4x20 for your needs, but I tire of listening to those who DO NOT OWN a QUALITY scope of that type. So, get a 2-7 of medium objective size AND of good quality and kill you some deer!!
turner is offline  
post #19 of 19 (permalink) Old 09-03-2013, 04:41 PM
B&C 140 Class
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 850
Turner makes alot of sense....

The only thing that I noticed when I switched me Leopold 2.5x8 VXIII for a Leopold 1.5x5 VXIII was it was not as easy to group a real small cluster at 100 yards. I did like the larger field of view and additional eye relief. That was a hunting rifle and I loved the 1.5x5 on it.

Karl
Karl.Luhr is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Deer Hunting Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome