.223ammo - Deer Hunting Forums
Rifle Hunting Discuss Rifle Season topics

Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 22 (permalink) Old 11-19-2012, 05:21 PM Thread Starter
Scrub Buck
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Lubbock,Tx
Posts: 26

I just bought a howa in .223 for hunting. I'm mostly going to be varmint and predator hunting with it but I want to take it deer hunting. Since there are an endless amount of choices for .223, I was wondering if y'all had any feed back for a good hunting round?
TxMulie10 is offline  
post #2 of 22 (permalink) Old 11-19-2012, 07:07 PM
timberghost's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: western new york
Posts: 3,942
Judging from experiences from friends that used a 223 for deer I would shy away from doing so. I'm sure that a properly placed shot would do the job but it's just the power factor that concerns me. My .02 cents.
timberghost is offline  
post #3 of 22 (permalink) Old 11-21-2012, 09:35 PM
Scrub Buck
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: covington va
Posts: 15
I would look for a quality bullet tip. Such a small caliber needs weight retention to drive into the vitals. Personally i would take headshots. I handload for mine.

If i had to do it i would look at black hills ammo in around a 90 gr round.
JayzDaddy is offline  
post #4 of 22 (permalink) Old 11-22-2012, 08:18 PM
B&C 140 Class
Hellbilly's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Citra,Fl
Posts: 986
62g fusion will tear them up

Born on a mountain raised in a cave huntin and fishin is all I crave
Hellbilly is offline  
post #5 of 22 (permalink) Old 11-23-2012, 10:28 PM
B&C 100 Class
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Northern Michigan
Posts: 72
If your going to use your 223 for deer you need to use a heavier constructed bullet. While not the best it can be done. You don't need to take head shots either. Put a good shot into the heart/lung area and you should be okay. Just remember that shot placement is key. Try the federal fusions or a nosler partition and see if your rifle likes either. Keep your shots at a decent range hopefully 100 yards or less.I don't know your shooting skills but avoid a risky headshot whether its a 223 or a 30/06 etc........
Tricky is offline  
post #6 of 22 (permalink) Old 11-25-2012, 05:34 PM
Scrub Buck
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Georgia
Posts: 9
Also try the Hornaday 75 grain BTHP... Those should do a good job as well.
GATideHunter is offline  
post #7 of 22 (permalink) Old 11-25-2012, 05:39 PM
Scrub Buck
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: covington va
Posts: 15
No you dont need headshots. But personally i would take them. I have a open field and regularly target shoot 400+yds. A headshot does 2 things. 1 its a clean drop on the spot kill or a clean miss and 2 damages no meat. This is personal experience and preferance.
JayzDaddy is offline  
post #8 of 22 (permalink) Old 11-25-2012, 06:03 PM
Scrub Buck
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Georgia
Posts: 9
I am a new hunter, but I have seen pictures of deer who have had people take head shots at and they just ended up hitting the jaw and not killing the deer. The deer runs off, the hunter never finds the deer, and the deer ends up dying later from starvation in agony. You can kill a deer by shooting it in it vital parts with a .223, which would be the only shots I would take IMHO.
GATideHunter is offline  
post #9 of 22 (permalink) Old 11-25-2012, 08:01 PM
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Oregon, Ohio
Posts: 8,383
223 for deer is just not a good choise, go up a bit, 243 if you are recoil sensitive. head shots not for me, a solid double lung shot works best as you have a lot of area to hit. Just my 2 cents. I am old school when it comes to deer hunting.
Hunting Man is offline  
post #10 of 22 (permalink) Old 11-25-2012, 10:55 PM
Scrub Buck
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Georgia
Posts: 9
The whitetail deer when have down in the south is smaller than the ones y'all have up north. They dont have to contend with the cold and dont have the extra weight. The coldest it may get down here on average is the low 30s with the occasional snow fall. I would prefer to use something bigger than the 5.56/.223 round, but it will work for the ones down here. I only have a rifle that will fire that round, but could easily convert my rifle to the 6.8 (.270) by changing out the upper receiver, but will have to live with what I have until I get the funds to purchase something like that. There have been many strides for that round. I will not hunt with anything that is not designed and tested specifically for deer. If they can get a 62 grain .223 to take down a deer, I am sure a 75 grain 5.56 could do it. Just my thoughts about it. Shot placement is the key for any round IMHO.
GATideHunter is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Deer Hunting Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome