nickon prostaff vs. Pantex game seeker - Deer Hunting Forums
Optics and Hunting Gear Post your thoughts on Optics, Scents, Clothing etc.

Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 7 (permalink) Old 12-23-2009, 04:47 PM Thread Starter
B&C 160 Class
hunt NH's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: concord nh
Posts: 1,203
nickon prostaff vs. Pantex game seeker

nikon is a 3-9x-40. pantex is a 3.5-10x-50. bolth seem real nice. simmaler fetures, nice eye releaf and i liked them both alot. price to close to even be a factor in the desision. what do you guys think of these two scopes?
hunt NH is offline  
post #2 of 7 (permalink) Old 12-23-2009, 05:15 PM Thread Starter
B&C 160 Class
hunt NH's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: concord nh
Posts: 1,203
Specifications for Pentax Gameseeker 3.5 - 10x 50mm Matte Variable Power Riflescope (PP):

Tube Diameter: 1 inch Objective Diameter: 50mm Eyepiece Diameter: 35mm Exit Pupil: 10.0 - 4.9mm Eye Relief: 3 inches Field of View: 28.6-9.4 ft. at 100 yards Adjustment Graduation: 1/4 in. at 100 yards Maximum Adjustment: 60 in. at 100 yards Length: 12.95 inches Weight: 18.8 oz. Reticle: Precision

Features of Pentax Gameseeker 3.5-10x50mm Matte Variable Power Riflescope(PP):

  • High density, precision-ground lenses and long-focal length internal oculars
  • Nitrogen filled and double sealed with heavy duty neoprene "O" rings (provides lifetime seal, making scope waterproof and fogproof
  • Dual Bias Springs exerts counter-pressure evenly for windage and elevation adjustments
  • Precision-Machined Click Assembly
  • Self-Lubricating Solid Brass Zoom Tube
  • Recoil-Tough Reticle
  • Multi-layer coating on all optical surfaces
  • Extremely hard, scratch resistant finish
  • Easy to mount design
  • Plenty of eye relief
  • Precision Plex Reticle
  • Pentax Lifetime Warranty

Last edited by hunt NH; 12-23-2009 at 05:19 PM.
hunt NH is offline  
post #3 of 7 (permalink) Old 12-23-2009, 05:17 PM
buckfever's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 5,650
I got a prostaff and cant complain about it at all.. Its a good scope for the $150..

Cant help you on the pentax.. Hadnt seen one of those yet..
buckfever is offline  
post #4 of 7 (permalink) Old 12-23-2009, 05:22 PM Thread Starter
B&C 160 Class
hunt NH's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: concord nh
Posts: 1,203
Specifications for Nikon Pro-Staff 3 - 9 x 40 Water Proof / Fog Proof Rifle-scopes:
Magnification: 3x-9xObjective Diameter (mm): 40Exit Pupil (mm): 4.4Eye Relief (in): 3.6FOV @ 100yds (ft): 33.8-11.3Tube Diameter: 1 inchObjective Outside Diameter (mm/in): 47.3/1.86Eyepiece Outside Diameter (mm/in): 39.3/1.55Length (in): 12.3Weight (oz): 13.7Adjustment Graduation: 1/4 MOAMax Internal Adjustment: 80 MOAParallax Setting (yds): 100

Features of Nikon Prostaff 3 - 9 x 40mm Rifle Scopes:
  • 100% Waterproof/Fogproof
  • Nikon Lifetime Full Warranty
  • Multicoated optics for up to 90% light transmission
  • Nikon anti-reflective multicoating
  • Precise, repeatable, 1/4 MOA reticle adjustments
  • Nitrogen filled and O-ring sealed
  • BDC (bullet drop compensating) reticle for easy holdover out to 600 yards (magnum calibers) is available
hunt NH is offline  
post #5 of 7 (permalink) Old 12-24-2009, 09:16 AM
B&C 140 Class
onehorse's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Montana
Posts: 798
I'm a Leupold guy and I don't own either of these. Having said that, both of these brands have good reputations as they great optic companies. Based on the specs that you have given, I would go with the Nikon for the following reasons:
1. That 50 mm objective lense is rather large in my opinion. Sure it lets more light in, but you will get all the light you need with the 40 mm. Also, the size of the lense is not the only factor in light tansmission.
2. The Nikon is substantially lighter than the Pentax. Even a few ounces starts to add up by the end of the day.
3. The Nikon has what looks like a great warranty.
4. It has more eye relief. (That's one of the important reasons I like Leupold.) This is a really important feature, especially when you have the power cranked up (which reduces eye relief) and are taking a shot from the prone position. Anyone who has ever had a "recoil kiss" from a scope to their eyebrow knows what I am talking about.
Based on these considerations, I would buy the Nikon.
onehorse is offline  
post #6 of 7 (permalink) Old 12-24-2009, 09:50 AM Thread Starter
B&C 160 Class
hunt NH's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: concord nh
Posts: 1,203
thanks for the input.
hunt NH is offline  
post #7 of 7 (permalink) Old 12-24-2009, 12:24 PM
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Oregon, Ohio
Posts: 8,381
Sorry I don't have either of the scope you are thinking about, so I can't give a valid opinion. Good luck on your choise though.
Hunting Man is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Deer Hunting Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome