| ||||
| Ive just shot carbons for awhile and have gotten acustom to them. I use to shoot aluminums a few years ago and i thinnk i like carbon results better.
__________________ Cholesterol kills more people than guns do, makes laws to control that! |
| ||||
| that's cool I was just wondering. AND your reason may be good input for someone else who's trying to decide which to use also
__________________ When You Live Off The Land, Livin is Good... "One Nation Under GOD" "IN GOD WE TRUST" Last edited by BruceBruce1959 : 02-21-2008 at 08:41 AM. |
| ||||
| After many years of shooting aluminum, I now shoot Easton Axis St 400 camo arrows with 2" plastic vanes. They are a 9.8 gpi arrow and are a bit pricey if you don't make up your own. I think Cabelas' charge around $125/doz cut. There is a glue kit for the inserts that you do, which is nice to be able to line up the broadheads as you glue them in. Throw on some 3 blade Muzzy 100's and it makes for a high tech killing machine. Or hide glue on a stone point to a cedar arrow and go low tech. I think carbon has some advantages over aluminum especially for the very high speed bows of today! |
| |||
| I have shot Easton ACC arrows for years always had good results. I shoot a Matthews bow at 70 lbs and the ACC has plenty of spine. They are tough two back when I shot aluminum it was one shot hit or miss and the arrow was waisted. I have taken two deer with the same arrow with the carbon which was unthinkable with alum. |
![]() |